Advertise on PinupLifestyle
Ok.. so i was looking at this new site thing, pinupparkinglot.. or whatever.. it seems like, to me, that a LOT of pinup models are getting more and more edgy.. or.. naked..
I know there different categories of modeling, but where does the line get drawn as far as pinup style portfolios??
is this pinup?
http://www.pinupparkinglot.com/blog_uploads/2009/01/_mg_6551-editwe...

or should these be considered somethign else??
this?:
http://www.pinupparkinglot.com/blog_uploads/2009/01/angem-012608-ch...

ABSOLUTELY NO OFFENSE to the photographers or models.. these photos are beautiful.. but are they "pinups"?????

Views: 2246

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I couldn't agree any more.

Rachie Pin-Up said:
Pinup is tease, not overtly sexual. No privates show in *real* pinup.
Hmm, to me, they aren't pinup, maybe they are touching some of the elements, but I wouldn't sya it's pin up. In my opinion pin up is about the tease and while there iss some nudity in some pinups, I think these pictures are more on the porn or fetish side.
I think that Kim Bombshell was right in saying that Pinup and Fetish have cross over audiences. The photos are Fetish, but I think that they are both beautiful shots.
Gorgeous shots on both counts especially the one on the bottom ! Hits all the right nerves LOL

I will say that i consider the line to be nipples and genitals. Pinup is tease, it is to photography and art what Burlesque is to dance. Pinup is not pornographic, it is good natured, naughty but nice, cute but spicy. To me the best sort of pinup is the off guard accidental exhibitionsim, the thing I call the "Elvgren Oops Factor".

I think many mistake pinup as being denoted by the presence of stockings, garters, and heels fused with retro-esque hairstyle and clothing. To me those are fashion accessories and not a uniform of the ideology.

One can do explicit vintage style erotica( would be awesome and way sexier than the current trend of teased out Silicone Blondes from SoCal) but it wont be pinup. Gil Elvgren is the epitome of pinup as is Alberto Vargas, Betty Grable, Rita Hayworth and even Louise Brooks. These were the girls you could bring home to mom but the dad would give the secret "high Five' while mom wasn't looking. That is pinup = )


John Robo said:
I think porn starts where pinup leaves off in the minds off. But that's just my opinion.



totally agree with this!
WOW! What the hell? Thats not my type of pin-up, way too raunchy for me. Thats beyond crossing the line and should be titled as porn. Thats not artsy- thats just another cheap way of guys getting off some naked chicks posing in sick positions. Everyones entitled to liking what they like but thats really putting a bad taste to something that I believed was alot classier at one point.


Deamon Doll said:
WOW! What the hell? Thats not my type of pin-up, way too raunchy for me. Thats beyond crossing the line and should be titled as porn. Thats not artsy- thats just another cheap way of guys getting off some naked chicks posing in sick positions. Everyones entitled to liking what they like but thats really putting a bad taste to something that I believed was alot classier at one point.


wow i am soo happy that i am not the only one who thinks like that!!! i was beginning to think that i was such a prude!!
I have always felt pin up was much more demure however in this day in age,pin up itself is alot of times considered "fetish". I have been a HUGE fan of christine kesslers work for awhile& love how she makes kink&fetish something so vivid& beautiful. I feel she too looks at pin up as fetish& is simply showing her vision of it. The lines of pin up&porn are definetely blurred here but she has blurred it beautifully.
I see those as fetish as others have said. There was a discussion on Model Mahem a while back as to what pinup is and someone posted the following and I really like it:
"Pin-up is tasteful, Pin-up is sexy but not sexual, evocative but not provocative, naughty but nice. It is a fine balance between innocent and tarty. "
total fetish shots. there's a difference between tasteful nudity and straight filth. too me, the second shot featuring the two models is tasteful nudity. it's fetish, but not smut. the first photo, though very beautiful seems a bit smutty. like something you might work on for your significant other.
i personally have an issue with a website that is suppose to feature plus sized "pinup" models. the models are gorgeous and have ample body. but i would say it's about 85% nudity. they just don't strike me as true pinup photos. it just looks like some hornball got as many incredibly large women together as possible, told them all to strip, and started shooting just to get his rock's off.
I agree with sadie. If it's pinup, you should be able to display it. Also, because pinups were always geared towards our military, they could never be nude. They're not allowed to possess anything pornographic.
every niche will find a home is my thinking. I agree with whoever talked about the original betty page pictures and Im sure during there day they were considered big time porn. now those images are on t shirts and coffee mugs ... personally I like the pin ups to leave something for the mind to wonder , consider etc .. to each there own

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Home Page
ROLL FOR RANDOM PHOTOS,
LOVE, COMMENT, & SHARE!


Advertise on PinupLifestyle

Latest Members

Follow Us!

Check out our friends:

© 2024   Created by PL Team.   Powered by

Widgets  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service