Ok, I have to vent about this..
They (the local morning show, who I really get a kick out of most of the time) did a segment about the rash amount of people getting Obama-oriented tattoos. It was a cool, interesting little piece in which they had interview a gentleman getting an Obama portrait on his leg. He said that he wanted it to remember being apart of history fifty years from now. Sharita Hutton made a comment when they cut back to the anchors that in fifty years, his tattoos would be old, wrinkley and you wouldn't be able to tell what they were anyhow.
As an avid collector of tattoos, aspiring apprentice and someone with even just a knowledge of the subject, it irked me to hear this said. People's perception on how tattoos age are based off of the tattoos they've seen on sixty and seventy year old men, most of which recieved their tattoos in the service (a lot of those over seas) or sun-soaked bikers who have never opened a bottle of sunscreen, let alone taken the time to cover their tattoos. Machines today are improved, the ink is improved, practice, sterilization are all improved as well. Simply taking care of your skin and the ink underneath will keep your tattoo looking just as good over the years.
People ask me and my boyfriend, who is quite decorated, "What about when your fifty and sixty years old?" Our answer? When I get to that age, I'm going to be worrying about retirement, my grandkids, getting shorter while my pants get higher and NOT DYING...not how my tattoos look to other people.
It's a question, much like "Did that hurt?", "How long/much?", and my favorite statement "You're going to regret those." Most often uttered by perfect strangers..who have tribal armbands.
You need to be a member of PinupLifestyle ♥ to add comments!
Join PinupLifestyle ♥